With
every one of our reviews - be they recaps of TV series, reviews of
books or even computer games, we usually include some kind of reference
to what it is actually about, it is after all, the most basic element of
whether someone would want to read or watch something.
So, The Dresden Files, is about a wizard in Chicago facing down all kinds of problems and breaking all the rules. The Iron Druid Chronicles, is about a millennia year old Druid getting by in a world full of deities that often wish him harm. The Elemental Assassin Series, is about a lethal magical assassin fighting the good fight in a corrupt city. The Morganville Vampires Series, is about a girl trying to live in a town completely controlled by vampires.
Basic,
simple descriptions of what a book series is about. And you would think
that the only way to change these descriptions would be to radically
rewrite the entire series. But no, according to many people, I can
completely change all of these series with one simple adjustment.
I
can make the protagonist a minority. Or I can introduce a non-tokened
major character who is a minority. Or I can introduce - horror of
horrors - several minorities!
If Harry Dresden were gay, then suddenly The Dresden Files is a series about sexuality. If Claire were Black, then The Morganville Vampires would
morph into a book about race. If Gin Blanco were followed around by
several GBLT friends, then they may even be books that are trying to
play politics or make a point!
Of
course, people forget that being straight is a sexuality, or that being
White is a race. Harry Dresden is definitely straight, we see several of
his love interests (and he hardly sees any woman without wanting to
have sex with her) yet, no-one would characterise this series as some
kind of treatise on straightness or straight sexuality. But include a
major gay character and suddenly it’s making a statement. Now it’s a
commentary on all gay sexuality, now it has an agenda.
This
is the power of the societal default - the default that allows a
privileged race, sexuality, gender, gender identity, etc to stand in as
the assumed. You can see this very clearly in the number of books that
don’t bother to describe skin tone - unless describing a POC (I once
read the line a “a girl was playing with an Asian boy” who can tell me
what race the girl was? If your answer was anything but White, you’re
deluding yourself).
The
most privileged state is considered the generic, it is automatic. You
don’t need a reason for your protagonist to be a cis, able bodied,
straight, white man. This is the base assumption. You actually need a
reason to make a character anything BUT a cis, able bodied, straight,
white man. So you can have a cast of 4 or 6 or 10 or even more - and
only have one woman because the straight protagonist needs to have a
love interest. Or maybe you have a Native American character to provide
some woo-woo, or a Black or gay side-kick to provide some sassy one
liners.
- Home
- About Us/Policies
- Book Reviews
- TV Series Reviews
- Other Reviews
- Discussions & Musings
- Interviews & Podcasts
- Fangs Lexicon
Showing posts with label marginalized people. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marginalized people. Show all posts
Friday, February 8, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)